The cyberwar state of the present world

Drama. Touchstone for reporting plays. To get a real idea of ​​the virtual, we need to look well around this particular stone. We need to look around to understand what cyberwar is or how it is defined.

Speaking of cyberwar, hyperbole and metaphor are the rule rather than the exception. Cyberthis, Cyberhat – You've noticed that the virtual world is inhabited by nouns and verbs taken from physics, and that cyberthings in the news have more dramatic images of physical objects than the cyberworld-making electronic ones. Currency images reside in authentic virtual cryptocurrency stories like Bitcoin. Perhaps the exception to this rule is that journals of physics, where readers are actually interested in the masses of electrons and cyberillum.

However when we read cyberwar stories, we see pictures of soldiers, firearms and materiel, including the story. When we sit at the desk and the computer reading to learn how to hack and how not to hack, we call them Cyber ​​Warrior and the men in flak jackets and helmets are accompanied by these stories. I was surprised that there would be a tank and bomber aircraft picture along with a cyber item.

What is cyber war without dramatic pictures and photos? Richard Clark, the president's former special adviser on cyber security, defined cyberwarfare as "a nation-state's task of accessing other nations' computers or networks in order to harm or disrupt." One of the key issues is that a state-state must be identified as criminal If this is true, then we are right I have been involved with cyberwarts for many years and have carried out attacks and attacks from China, Russia, the United States, Israel, Georgia, Ukraine, Korea, Syria, Iran, Estonia, and many more – though countries have always denied it, with clear indicators of the evidence. That these countries have set up their digital attackers on each other's networks, computers and data .NET Arka, computer and data loss has become.

So of course, there have been cyberrattacks by the state and. But is this a cyber war? Professor of Security Studies at King's College. Thomas Reed says there is no cyberwar. He showed a tendency to define cyberwar in terms of physical infrastructure disasters – where water stops "illumination, trains are blocked, banks are losing our financial records, roads are in chaos, elevators fail, and planes fall from the sky." And he says that it won't happen. In fact, he has a 2013 book, "Cyber ​​War Will Not Take Place".

Others are not so truthful about the subject and the possibility. Cyber ​​Command's budget is skyrocketing in most government spending in the United States. It has doubled over the years: $ 1 million dollars in 202, $ 202 million in 20 and $ 1 million7 million in 20. It buys a lot of electrons, lots of code and lots of cyber warriors (flan jackets sans). These increases lead to a similar but not as dramatic inflation of cyberbudget in other countries.

There are all the cyber toll on hand, and no one will be tempted to use what is being created? Is cyber war inevitable, or is there any way? This is a question that policymakers are taking seriously. Big thinkers like Patrick Lynn, Fritz Alhoff, and Neil C. Rowe have written several articles, such as Is Possible to Wage a Just Cyber ​​War? And War 2.0: Cyberweeps and Morals for Exploring Options. There are (conventional) laws of war and there should be a similar guideline for cyberconflicts. Don't start looking seriously at these things too soon.

When we try to find the title of this article to answer that sentence, it must be on the full map, because the definition of cyberwar is just like all maps on this article. It is indeed and literally all over the world. The definition of cyberwar varies from country to country and from organization to organization. An article in Cyberwarfare's Wild West (flying metaphors) attempts to seriously highlight such diverse ideas on the subject, whatever its title. Its discussion is useful, but its conclusion is inseparable.

The Tallinn Manual of 302 pages is the result of a three-year study by experts on this topic that seeks to establish this national definition. It can be read for free. However, not all potential parties agree to the cyberconflicts reached here.

OK, so can we best answer the cyberwar state on earth? Cyberattacks are widely spread around the world. They are run by multiple state actors and stateless. They are driven by state actors who impose blame on other states and stateless actors over whom they claim to have no control or input but are politically aligned. These are continued by hacktivists, who seek political change through disabling or malfunctioning of sites, networks, and information. Driven by them for the purpose of pure profit. And they are driven by ne-way-wells who only take pleasure in a small mime.

All such attacks are increasing steadily, though the vast majority remain relatively unchanged, such as the Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS). However, there is very little evidence of a lot of damage to the physical infrastructure. There is very little evidence that people are physically harmed by such attacks. It is still unknown whether this national event will actually take place.

Dr. Reed says that they did not win. DRS. Lynn, Alhof and Rowe show the way to avoid national losses. Richard Clark and former Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, say this is inevitable and we must prepare – a few million dollars.

Albert Einstein famously said, "You cannot prevent and prepare for war at the same time." Let's just hope he was wrong in the cyber war.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *